Skip to main content

Supporting Nat in his contribution to politics



Some of you know how Nat and I met and I thought I will share for those who do not know.

 

Prelude

My political awakening came in 2011 when an opposition party (not the Workers’ Party) contested in the ward I used to stay in. After GE2011, I decided to find out more about what the other alternatives parties stood for. So, I visited a few parties and got to know their members.

 

The First Impression

I had received an email to invite me to the Workers’ Party Headquarters on 4th June 2011. I was a little late for the session so when I came in I was ushered to be seated with a group of less than 10 people.  In this session, there were 2 facilitators and they were identified by their blue polo T-Shirt with WP logo.  After I settled in, 1 of the facilitators encouraged us to ask any questions that we may have about the party or politics in general.  Hence, I took the opportunity to ask a few questions as I needed to leave early for Father’s Day Celebration.

 

I could still remember quite a number of the answers to my questions.  1 of them being the facilitator asking for Nat’s permission to share about the fact that his mother was also volunteering with the party. I was very impressed with Nat as I found it to be rather challenging to share what the opposition stood for to my parents during the campaign period.

 

First “Coincidental” Meetup

I used to work at 1 of the companies at the Airport Logistics Park of Singapore (ALPS) where there are very limited options to have lunch.  There was only the canteen or the Western Food café.  Occasionally, I would treat myself to the food at the café.  One day I decided to eat at the café and then I saw Nat coming in with a group of colleagues.  Our eyes met and he came to say hello to my colleague and I.

 

Courtship

After this encounter, Nat decided to ask me for lunch regularly at the canteen which I agreed.  Lunches became dinners and soon we were attending Presidential Election Rallies together. We decided to take the relationship to the next level after a couple of months.

 

Marriage

Nat and I have been together since 2011 and married since 2014. We have been through many adversities and I am glad to have him by my side and as my biggest cheerleader. I may have a more challenging journey riding out the storm without such a supportive spouse. I have known Nat to be a polite, filial, kind and intellectual person. As a spouse, I can attest to his character. In fact how he behaves at home and outside is very similar.

 

Though Nat and I are very different individuals, we complement each other in many ways. We enjoy engaging and sharing our varied points of views knowing that there is always something we can learn from it. The bible says, “[a]s iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another”. That is something I can really relate to in the course of our marriage.

 

Thoughts about Nat’s Candidacy

Nat has always been this humble and industrious person. I know that whatever role he is asked to perform, he will do his best. As a spouse I will do my best to support him, mentally, emotionally and spiritually.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Acquaintances with Benefits

When I was young (in upper primary), my birthday wishes were similar.  It was to have many friends.  That could be due to the fact that I am an only child and may feel lonely at times.  Thanks to my best friends (you know who you are), I seldom feel lonely.  I can easily identify who my best friends are.  They are people I would ask for opinions on important decisions I have to make, meet relatively regularly (at least bimonthly, quarterly) for chit-chat and my life would have been very different without them. According to Robin Dunbar , in order to maintain stable social relationships where an individual knows who each person is, and how each person relates to every other person.  Friends are essentially different from acquaintances.  Acquaintances are typically: #1. People whom you may have only met a few times at an event/function; #2. Classmates/schoolmates/coursemates you have encountered casually; #...

Personal Perspective on CHC Fiasco

My personal perspective on the City Harvest Church fiasco: #1. God is omnipresent (present everywhere), omnipotent (all powerful), omniscient (all knowing) and God knew about this episode. I believe God is watching.; #2. The CAD does not charge without concrete evidence (they have taken sufficient time to investigate - 2 years). May justice prevail.; #3. It is unavoidable for members of the public with little information about Christianity to judge.  It is also one of my weaknesses to be quick to judge/form negative impression about others, which is unhealthy.; #4. I believe to a certain extent, the message of giving and tithing is relatively strong in City Harvest Church - I may be wrong.  (fyi, I have visited the church a couple of times) My personal belief is that it is important to give to God because God is the creator of everything that exists. He owns everything and we are simply stewards of what we have been entrusted with.  Though I h...

Outlier

It is always amazing meeting outliers. One who respectfully defies what ageing means in recent decades.  It is awesome to encounter a senior (almost twice my age) who is fitter than me. So inspiring! She embodies the example of good stewardship and living well in the last trimester of life 🧓🏻💛